Publications and events

The EMA has responded to the Irish Department of Finance’s consultation on the implementation of the Payment Accounts Directive (PAD). The EMA supports the aims of the Directive: to improve transparency around fees, facilitate switching between accounts, and ensure access to basic bank accounts. Similar to the response to HMT, the EMA expressed concern about the lack of clarity around the scope of the Directive, and proposed that the scope be more clearly defined. If not, it could bring a wide variety of e-money accounts into the scope unnecessarily, such as prepaid cards or online wallets, which are generally considerably different from bank current accounts in terms of consumer usage and purpose. Read the EMA response.

The Electronic Money Association (EMA) has responded to the FCA’s Call for input on the regulatory barriers to innovation, as EMA members have long had to grapple with regulatory features that prevent them either from developing a viable business model, or from growing beyond a certain size.

In this response, the EMA has focused mainly on EU regulation, as it has the greatest impact on our members, many of whom are authorized in the UK or Gibraltar and passport into other EU member states under the Freedom to Provide Services.

Read EMA response to FCA call for input on regulatory barriers to innovation.

On 27 July, HM Treasury published a consultation on the application of the Interchange Fee Regulation in the UK, asking for feedback on their proposals on credit and debit card caps, a time-limited exemption from the rules for three-party schemes, and the regulatory structure. The EMA’s response to each question is below:

• Credit cards: The EMA agrees with HMT’s plans to apply the same cap on interchange fees as set out in the regulation (i.e. maximum of 0.3% per domestic or international transaction).
• Debit cards: The EMA agrees with HMT’s plans to apply a “weighted average” (i.e. interchange fees cannot exceed more than the equivalent of 0.2% of the annual average transaction value of all domestic debit card transactions within each payment card scheme). However the EMA raises concerns about the uncertainty this may bring for industry, and supports a review of the policy once its impact has been measured and analysed by the PSR.
• Three-party schemes: The EMA agrees with HMT’s proposal to exempt three-party schemes that do not exceed 3% of market share across all card products for the maximum 3 year period permitted under the regulation. 
• Regulatory oversight: Agrees in principle with HMT’s proposed regulatory regime of splitting regulatory responsibilities between the PSR, the FCA, and the Trading Standards Institute. However the EMA raises concerns about the potential for duplication of effort for firms, and calls for guidance for firms setting out the remit and jurisdiction of each regulator.

[button link=”https://emaprd.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/EMA-Response-to-HMT-Interchange-Fee-Consultation.pdf” style=”download” color=”green”]Download the full response (PDF)[/button]

On 27th July, the Slovenian Office for Money Laundering Prevention from the Ministry of Finance published a new draft of their Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Act (ZPPDFT) to bring it in line with 4MLD. The EMA’s response raises 4 issues with the draft:

• The draft scope of the Act extends to credit institutions, payment institutions and electronic money institutions passporting into Slovenia on a cross-border basis under Freedom of Services, and should be limited to those authorised in Slovenia or operating in Slovenia under the Freedom of Establishment only; 
• The translation of the term “payment instrument” as “electronic medium” is legally unclear, potentially narrowing the e-money exemption from CDD, so the original EU translation should be used
• The draft has incorrectly transposed the e-money CDD exemption by requiring EMIs providing reloadable cards that can be used outside of Slovenia to conduct CDD, regardless of any limits on the amount.
• The current draft translation of the redemption provision under the e-money exemption from CDD doesn’t permit redemption transfers over €100 to a bank account to be exempt from CDD, so should be amended.

[button link=”https://emaprd.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/EMA-Response-to-Slovenian-Ministry-of-Finance-on-Draft-ZPPDFT.pdf” style=”download” color=”green”]Download full response (PDF)[/button]

The EMA has responded to HM Treasury’s consultation on the implementation of the EU Payment Accounts Directive (PAD).The EMA supports the aims of the Directive: to improve transparency around fees, facilitate switching between accounts, and ensure access to basic bank accounts. We also support HMT’s proposed approach – to introduce as little disruption as possible to UK firms by aligning the implementing rules with the UK’s existing system. However, the scope of the directive in relation to non-bank payment accounts lacks clarity. As a result it could bring a wide variety of e-money accounts into the scope unnecessarily, such as prepaid cards or online wallets, which are generally considerably different from bank current accounts in terms of consumer usage and purpose. This would lead to significant disruption and cost for UK e-money issuers.

The law implementing PAD is due to be adopted and published by the UK government by 18 September 2016, with certain elements of the requirements applying by early 2018.

[button link=”https://emaprd.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/EMA-response-to-HMT-Consultation-on-PAD.pdf” style=”download” color=”green”]Download the EMA response (PDF)[/button]

29 May 2015   EMA response on Cyber Security Issues